IAEA, CEPN, EDF, COGÉMA, ARÉVA and IRSN bully Mari Takenouchi and Yury Bandazhevsky and sacrifice Japan and Belarus 

IAEA, CEPN, EDF, COGÉMA, ARÉVA and IRSN が竹野内真理とバンダジェフスキー博士に圧力をかけ、日本とベラルーシの両国を犠牲にしている!


Prof. Bandazhevsky, a renowned medical scientist on Chernobyl health consequences, the former Rector of Gomel State Medical Institute, was arrested in 1999 for Presidential Decree of combat against terrorism and was later convicted in 2001 for allegedly taking a bribe from his student without any material evidence, and his imprisonment continued until 2006.
(The photo was taken in January 2000 when he was leaving the prison after the 1st arrest.)


A German blogger wrote this amazing article on ETHOS and CORE, the follow-up program of ETHOS implemented in Belarus. 


I feel overwhelmingly honored that I was covered with Dr. Bandazhevsky, the prominent medical scientist I respect most in the world!


Unfortunately, the original blog was already deleted.
残念なことにオリジナルのブログは既に消去されています。(コピーを取っておいてよかったです。) http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/05/20/iaea-cepn-edf-cogema-areva-and-irsn-bully-mari-takenouchi-and-yury-bandazhevsky-and-sacrifice-japan-and-belarus/より

Evacuate Japanese pregnant women immediately!


IAEA, CEPN, EDF, COGÉMA, ARÉVA and IRSN bully and threat Mari Takenouchi and Yury Bandazhevsky and sacrifice Japan and Belarus.

IAEA, CEPN, EDF, COGÉMA, ARÉVA and IRSN が竹野内真理とバンダジェフスキー博士に圧力をかけ、日本とベラルーシの両国を犠牲にしている!

The Aim: Irradiated agriculture and forcing irradiated food products on people and the total avoidance of evacuation.


The Victims: All.


And the brave. The parents. The journalists. The independent experts. With little money, with little labs. But all the evidences, the world needs.


Here is the story JAPAN (TEPCO irradiated) and BELARUS (Chernobyl irradiated) share.


In Belarus, shortly after the explosions the life time dose was incresed to 350 mSv.


In Japan, shortly after the explosions the yearly / annual dose was increased to 20 mSv.


Why? To avoid evacuation. And: To use the people as guinea pigs (Effect of “low” doses / Internal Emitters on Body and DNA).


In Belarus a FAKE AID program was used to do all this: ETHOS – later the “successor” CORE.


In Japan the same FAKE AID program was used: ETHOS and later CORE.


-> Force the people to live in irradiated areas <-


Responsible for these programs: IAEA, CEPN, EDF, COGÉMA, ARÉVA and IRSN (more below).
Current Situation in Japan about CORE (pro nuclear link):

プログラムの責任団体:IAEA, CEPN, EDF, COGÉMA, ARÉVA and IRSN (下記に詳細).

Current Situation in Japan about CORE (pro nuclear link)

The prominent victims:
Belarus: Yury Bandazhevsky

Professor Yuri Bandazhevsky – as a member of a committee of experts at the request of the Belarusian authorities – was publicly denounced after  he critisized a  financial report. He said the mostly useless studies were financed with money from the IAEA / WHO, UNICEF and the United Kingdom and Germany. Large sums which were intended for the victims of Chernobyl flowed into nonsensical studies such as “Smoking is harmful to health”.


Takenouchi's Note: Same in Japan where more than 3 trillion yen is being used for decontamination, which could be used for evacuation.  Furthermore, decontamination work creates further number of radiation exposed people.)

Also, “For the nuclear lobby, any research indicating harm from ionising radiation represents a commercial threat that must at all costs be averted.


Research on damage to the human genome (one of the most serious consequences of the contamination) was not part of the international project requested of the WHO in 1991 by the health ministers of Ukraine, Belarus and the Russian Federation.


Yet dental caries was made a research priority. And although these countries had addressed their research request to the WHO, it was the IAEA which planned the project.” http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who


The responsibility for the distribution of aid money was under the Ministry of Health Clinical Institute of Radiological Medicine and Endocrinology, both were contractual partners of Prof. Lengfelder. SOURCE: http://prete.at/sub/aktu/Trinkspruch.pdf MORE: http://prete.at/sub/aktu.php

支援金の支給はベラルーシ保健省の放射線医学研究所と内分泌学臨床研究所の管轄であり、両方ともランフェルダー教授と契約を交わしていた。http://prete.at/sub/aktu/Trinkspruch.pdf MORE: http://prete.at/sub/aktu.php

Prof. Dr. med. Edmund Lengfelder is a board member of the The Otto Hug Radiation Institute, Munich (http://www.oh-strahlen.org/) and member of German Association for Chernobyl Help (http://www.dvth.de/ / no longer active) but members of the DVTH were (or are) also members of the right-wing psych sect VPM Association for the Advancement of Psychological knowledge of human (german: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verein_zur_F%C3%B6rderung_der_Psychologischen_Menschenkenntnis).

ランフェルダー教授(医学博士)はミュンヘンにある、オットーハーグ放射線研究所(http://www.oh-strahlen.org/)の理事であり、チェルノブイリ救済のためのドイツ連合(http://www.dvth.de/ / 活動停止状態)のメンバーだが、この組織のメンバーは右翼セクトである人間心理学的知識向上連合、VPM(ドイツ語サイトhttp://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verein_zur_F%C3%B6rderung_der_Psychologischen_Menschenkenntnis)のメンバーでもある。

Lengfelder initiated several Chernobyl conferences, the 2006 Congress was postponed several times because of the VPM scandal. I myself (the writer of this blog, a German volunteer for Chernobyl children) destroyed many many handouts during the Belarusian-German Meeting in Germany, Geseke, 2006.



Meanwhile Lengfelder occurs hardly appeared in public. What about his health is unknown. But what it important: Lengfelder met the independent belarusian Prof. Yuri Bandazhevsky shortly before Bandazhevsky was arrested by belarusian authorities.


The European Parliament awarded a Freedom Pass for Bandazhevsky, Amnesty International speaks of Silencing Academia.


Lengfelder designated Bandazhevsky as criminal. Lengfelder is a good friend of belarusian dictator Lukashenko.


Luckily Bandazhevsky was released and fled the country. He lost his institute in Gomel, Belarus (one of the most Chernobyl irradiated areas). But he continues to work for true science, radiation, and the children: http://www.chernobyl-today.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=51%3Aassossiation&catid=18%3Aactivities&Itemid=42&lang=en


One of his works and NOW IMPORTANT FOR JAPAN and EVERYONE:
Cesium directly harms the hearts of our children: MODIFICATIONS IN CARDIAC-VASCULAR SYSTEM OF CHILDREN, LIVING IN CONTAMINATED WITH RADIOISOTOPES: http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/Bandajevski_2001_Radiocaesium_and_heart.pdf

彼の研究の一つで、今最も日本人とすべての人に重要なものが、放射性セシウムが直接的に子供たちの心臓に障害を与えるという研究だ。「放射性核種に汚染された地域に住む子供たちの循環器系への異変」MODIFICATIONS IN CARDIAC-VASCULAR SYSTEM OF CHILDREN, LIVING IN CONTAMINATED WITH RADIOISOTOPES: http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/Bandajevski_2001_Radiocaesium_and_heart

We can rightly consider the Cesium-137 in relatively small doses (20-30 Bq/kg); a breach of the regulatory processes in the body: PAGE 2 – 3: http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/BANDAJEVSKI_UNSCEAR_-_REUTERS_Sept_22nd_2010_Eng_V2.pdf


He was able to salvage something from his work, to him we owe valuable information like this: http://www.chernobyl-today.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=55&Itemid=45&lang=en


One of Solange Fernex‘s major present concerns is the consequences of the Chernobyl catastrophe, especially as to how the heightened background radiation affects the human genome.

In a speech she made in Kiev this year, she brought to the public’s attention the inbred scientific collusion between the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the International Agency for Atomic Energy (IAAE) – a complot that seeks to portray the nuclear industry as being Chernobyl’s only real victim.


During her speech she also made public the plight of Professor Yuri I. Bandazhevsky, Rector of the Medical Institute in Gomel, whose scientific research on Chernobyl children contradicted UNSCEAR‘s findings: “No increase in birth defects, congenital malformations, stillbirths, or premature births could be linked to radiation exposure caused by the accident.”


When she had visited his institute, he had shown her a collection of fetal and stillborn anomalies collected over the course of 2 weeks — a number normally found over a year’s duration.


Professor Bandazhevsky had been planning to present his findings to a parliamentary delegation from Minsk.


Instead Bandazhevsky was arrested and, on 18 June 2001, was sentenced to 8 years in a gulag. Solange Fernex appeals: “The times when Galileo Galilei was persecuted by the Holy Inquisition for his scientific findings should be past. The truth on the health consequences of Chernobyl cannot be concealed, as this was possible, centuries ago, for the movements of the earth around the sun. Science must cease to be silenced by the economic interests of the promoters of nuclear energy.”



This is one of the reasons why real science is suppressed and not recognized.
BANDAZHEVSKY: http://www.sanurezo.org/spip.php?article7
このような経緯で真実の科学が圧力を受け、認識されずに今日まで来たのである。BANDAZHEVSKY: http://www.sanurezo.org/spip.php?article7

The prominent victims:

Japan: Mari Takenouchi – Support Mari Takenouchi and Radiation Protection
SIGN: https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/Office_of_the_Prosecutor_Iwaki_Branch_Fukushima_Japan_Support_Mari_Takenouchi_and_Radiation_Protection/
署名 https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/Office_of_the_Prosecutor_Iwaki_Branch_Fukushima_Japan_Support_Mari_Takenouchi_and_Radiation_Protection/

“My name is Mari Takenouchi, a Japanese journalist who is under criminal accusation by Fukushima ETHOS leader, Ms. Ryoko Ando (real name: Yoko Kamata)for a wording of “human experiment” in my single tweet.” http://savekidsjapan.blogspot.jp/2014/02/our-planet-tv.html
and: http://savekidsjapan.blogspot.jp/2014/05/please-disseminate-this-article-along.html



Along with Mr. Mitsuhei Murata, the then Ambassador to Switzerland from Japan,  Mari Takenouchi making an appeal to the IAEA Deputy Director General, Mr. David Waller for suspension of nuclear power plants in Japan, earthquake-prone nation in 2002.  

She writes on her blog:
My name is Mari Takenouchi, a freelance journalist and a translator on radiation, nuclear and earthquake issues. I evacuated from Tokyo with my then 1 year old son to Okinawa in the afternoon of March 15, and since I was outside in the morning of March 15, and we got considerably sick for 2 or 3 months after that.  I am not sure of the causal relationship, but I recently found that I have Hashimoto’s Disease and my thyroid is swallen double the size compared to normal. ” 


In 2002, I visited IAEA by myself to directly ask them to stop nuclear power plants in Japan in relation to earthquake. I told IAEA staff members, “If accident took place in Japan, the seismically active nation, IAEA, the promotor of nuclear should be in trouble.” 「(福島事故の10年近く前の)2002年には、私は一人でIAEAを訪問し、地震との兼ね合いで日本の原発を止めてくれるように直訴に行きました。IAEAの人々には、『もしも地震国日本で事故が起きたら、原子力推進のIAEAにとって問題となるでしょう』と言いました」
One of the staff mebers I met out of his office house was my colleagues’ acquaintace, who said the follwoing, “Ms. Takenouchi, this issue is too big to be dealt with.  There are already nuclear plants built in Japan all over.  I think we can do nothing unless all the people raise their voice against nuclear power.  I think it could be possible that 5 million Japanese got killed due to nuclear accident hit by an earthquake.”


日本人のIAEA職員で、かつての私の同僚の知り合いがいたのですが、そのIAEA職員は私にこう言いました。 「竹野内さん、この問題は大きすぎて誰も対処できないのです。日本国中にすでに原発は立っています。全国民が原発反対の声を挙げなければ、なにもできない。地震による原発事故で500万人の日本人が死ぬこともありえるでしょう。

Protection against Fear, not against Radiation:


For a quarter of a century a systematic crime against humanity has been perpetrated by people in senior positions at the heart of Europe. The people living in Western Europe, so advanced technologically, remain indifferent and largely disinformed.


In order to preserve the consensus around the military and civilian nuclear industry, the nuclear lobby and the official medical establishment have, for the past 26 years, knowingly condemned millions of human guinea pigs to an experiment on their bodies with new diseases in the vast laboratory provided by the territories contaminated by Chernobyl.

Children are being treated like laboratory animals, under observation from French and German scientists, and French NGO’s like the CEPN, Mutadis Consultants, ETHOS and CORE, who must take their share of the responsibility.

(Translator’s note: CEPN is the Centre d’étude sur l’Evaluation de la Protection dans le domaine Nucléaire ; Mutadis, ETHOS and CORE are all offshoots of the French nuclear industry, financed either through Electricité de France or the Autorité de Sureté Nucléaire. 訳注:CEPNはフランス原子力防護評価研究所、ムタディスもETHOSもCOREもフランス原子力産業から派生したものであり、EDFやフランスの原子力当局から資金提供を受けている。)

“The same fate awaits the Japanese people and their children living in areas contaminated by the Fukushima disaster because the same strategy is being put in place in Japan with the same players, the same pseudo-scientific justifications and under the aegis of the same authorities.”


“In this article I will detail the actions taken by representatives of the international scientific and political community at different levels of involvement that have harmed the children of Belarus around Chernobyl. First, we need to examine the management of the consequences of the disaster by the United Nations (UN) agencies responsible for nuclear power and health: the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), promoter of nuclear power, and the World Health Organisation (WHO) whose goal is “to bring all people to the highest attainable level of health.”

Both agencies undertake and endorse, from their position of authority within the scientific and medical domains, the criminal policy imposed by the five member states of the UN Security Council in the area of nuclear power in general and in the contaminated territories around Chernobyl and Fukushima in particular.”


“This policy, while giving the appearance of being scientific, is based on a strategy of ignorance that is anything but scientific. The sleight of hand employed by the nuclear lobby is to use the experience of the bombs used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki to explain Chernobyl. The nuclear lobby compares the very high levels of radiation released in the initial flash when the bombs in Japan exploded with the very low levels of radiation around Chernobyl and claims a priori that these low levels cannot be the cause of the pathologies that have appeared since the Chernobyl accident. But the two events and the mechanisms by which they damage health are not the same. One does not explain the other. No atomic bomb exploded at Chernobyl. There were two explosions of an atomic nature (power excursions) and a fire that lasted 10 days.”


“Today the ambient and surface background radiation around the power station is low. But huge amounts of artificial radioactive elements were ejected during the thermal explosions and while the fire raged for ten days, these elements were dispersed over great distances by the winds and rains.”


These long-lived elements contaminate the environment, plants, animals and humans. They have destroyed the health and the lives of hundreds of thousands of young liquidators who ingested and inhaled radioactive particles while working around the plant, and they will continue to contaminate future generations. Genetic and perigenetic damage will appear in the liquidators’ children and then be transmitted to subsequent generations, causing suffering that the first generation will not have known. (1).”



WHO and IAEA recognise only the deaths of around fifty liquidators who worked at the plant in the first few days, and about 9000 additional cancers up to 2056, while in 2001, official data from the Ukraine and the Russian Federation claimed that 10% of the liquidators had already died and 30% of them were disabled (there were more than 800,000 from across the USSR). The 2 million farmers and more than 250,000 children from Belarus who live in radioactive areas, were, according to the IAEA and WHO, unharmed by the Chernobyl accident. The large number of illnesses, which are increasing and getting worse every year in Belarus, are attributed officially to stress, “radiophobia” or to parental alcoholism.

WHOとIAEAは、最初の数日間で工場で働いた約50人のリクイデーターの死亡と2056年までに約9000件の癌のみを認め、2001年にウクライナとロシア連邦の公式データは、 リクイデーターはすでに死亡しており、そのうち30%が無効になっています(ソビエト連邦全体で800,000人以上が死亡しました)。 IAEAとWHOによると、放射性地域に住んでいる200万人の農民とベラルーシ出身の250,000人以上の子供たちは、チェルノブイリ事故による被害を受けていませんでした。 ベラルーシで毎年増加し悪化している多くの病気は、公式にはストレス、「放射線恐怖症」または親のアルコール依存症に起因しているとしています。

quote from the latest nuclear gag contract:
Contract between IAEA and Fukushima Medical University (“Dr” Yamashita)
“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…” http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/energy/fukushima_2012/pdfs/fukushima_iaea_en_06.pdf
「…IAEAは、大学と協力して、会議、セミナー、ワークショップの開催に努め、人の健康に対する放射線の影響に対する国民の意識を高め、「放射線恐怖」と心的外傷後ストレス障害の問題に取り組むことを目的とする。 福島の人口…」外務省のページより

http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/energy/fukushima_2012/pdfs/fukushima_iaea_en_06.pdf (Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
basis for this gag contract was the first one, quote:
“it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.” http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

「世界保健機関は、国際原子力機関が、世界保健機関の権利を損なうことなく、世界中の平和的利用のための原子力の研究開発および実用化を奨励、支援、調整する主要な責任を負っていることを認めています。 あらゆる側面において、研究を含む国際的な保健活動の促進、開発、支援、調整に関心を持つこと。」 http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

Abel Gonzales, Director of Radiation Transport and Waste Safety at the IAEA, Vice President of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), director of the Radioprotection Agency in Argentina, Argentina’s delegate to the IAEA and to UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation), and adviser to the WHO, told the Kiev conference, (4-8 June 2001) that was filmed by Swiss television, that it was impossible, given the low levels of radioactivity to prove a correlation between the radioactivity and illness – that it was “an insoluble epistemological problem.” He used these words: “there are no grounds for direct knowledge at this stage. We do not know! “.

アルゼンチンのアベル・ゴンザレス氏は、IAEAの放射性物質輸送・廃棄物安全担当ディレクター、国際放射線防護委員会(ICRP)副会長、アルゼンチン放射線防護庁長、アルゼンチンのIAEAおよびUNSCEAR(国連科学委員会 原子放射線の影響)、WHOのアドバイザーは、スイステレビで撮影されたキエフ会議(2001年6月4〜8日)で、低レベルの放射能を考えるにあたり、放射能と病気の関係は「解決できない認識論的問題」と述べている。 ゴンザレスは以下の言葉も述べた。「この段階で直接的な知識の根拠はありません。 我々は知りません!
And yet we do know that Professor Bandazhevsky ended up in prison and in exile precisely because he demolished this pretence that “we do not know” with his own rigorous scientific research that he undertook over a period of nine years. Unlike Gonzales (who is a physicist), Bandazhevsky is a pathologist and he mastered the “direct knowledge” that the IAEA representative said he lacked and that, he claimed, could not be known at this stage. Bandazhevsky discovered the correlation. He proved the cause and effect relationship between low level radiation and the destruction of vital organs.
それでも、バンダシェフスキー教授が9年間に渡って行ってきた独自の厳密な科学的研究により、この原子力産業側による「知らないふり」に挑んだ。それで、バンダシェフスキー教授は刑務所に行かされ、亡命せねばならなかったことは、良く知られている。 ゴンザレス(物理学者)とは異なり、バンダシェフスキーは病理学者であり、IAEAの代表が現時点では知ることができないと主張した「直接的な知識」を習得し、相関関係を発見した。 バンダシェフスキーは「低レベルの放射線」と「生命維持に必要な臓器の破壊の因果関係」を証明したのである。

“During my investigations, I discovered that French scientists, members of non-governmental organisations, have played an active role in this harmful policy that condemns Belarusian children to suffer from a variety of unknown diseases, caused by the radiation. These children are not offered any radioprotection nor any qualified medical help. French organisations, financed by rich European countries collected data on the levels of contamination in people, gave them lessons on how to avoid excessive contamination, but did not offer medical treatment to the contaminated children they observed . (Translator's note: same as Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Fukushima!!!)Even worse, they refused to distribute the natural pectin-based additive to these highly contaminated children, a product which accelerates the elimination of radionuclides from the body and keeps the levels of contamination in children below the threshold at which damage to vital organs become irreversible.”
「調査中に、非政府組織のメンバーであるフランスの科学者が、ベラルーシの子供たちが放射線によって引き起こされるさまざまな未知の病気に苦しむことを非難するこの有害な政策に積極的役割を果たしたことが判明した。 これらの子供たちは、放射線防護も医学的援助も提供されない。(訳者注:日本の広島と長崎、福島と同じ!) 裕福なヨーロッパ諸国から資金提供を受けたフランスの組織は、人々の汚染レベルに関するデータを収集し、過剰な汚染を回避する方法についての教訓を与えたが、観察した汚染された子供たちに医学的治療を提供しませんでした。 さらに悪いことに、彼らはこれらの高度に汚染された子供たちに天然のペクチンベースの添加剤を配布することさえ拒否しました。

Who are these people that have played such a role in a story that began 27 years ago? What are their goals? What exactly is going on?
「27年前に始まったストーリーでそのような役割を果たしたこれらの人々は誰ですか? 彼らの目標は何なのか? 正確には何が起こっているのですか?」
“Faced with the inaction and deceit of the Soviet Government about the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster, the physicist, Professor Vassili Nesterenko academic, director of the Institute of Nuclear Energy of the Academy of Sciences of Belarus, contested government policy from the first few hours following the accident. He demanded the evacuation of residents within a 100 km radius of the plant fire. He was sacked from his post in July 1987, for alarmist behaviour and for sowing panic, and finally left the state run institute in 1990 to create the independent Institute of Radiation Safety “Belrad” to help children in the contaminated territories. Working in the most contaminated villages of Belarus, he organised 370 local radiological monitoring centres, where doctors, teachers and nurses were given training in radioprotection, and families were taught how to process food to reduce contamination. Funded initially by the government, during the brief period of “democratisation”, these centres are closed today after the nuclear lobby wrested control of the situation.”
「チェルノブイリ原発事故の影響についてのソビエト政府の怠慢と欺瞞に直面し、物理学者、ヴァッシリー・ネステレンコ教授(ベラルーシ科学アカデミー原子力エネルギー研究所所長)は、最初の数時間から政府の政策に異議を唱えた後、原発の火災から半径100 km以内の住民の避難を要求しました。彼は1987年7月、警戒行動とパニックの種をまいたとされ、職務から解任され、ついに1990年、国営研究所を去り、汚染された地域の子供たちを支援する独立した放射線安全研究所「Belrad」を設立しました。彼はベラルーシの最も汚染された村で働いており、370の地元の放射線モニタリングセンターを組織しました。そこでは医師、教師、看護師が放射線防護の訓練を受け、汚染を減らすために食品を加工する方法を家族に教えました。最初は政府が資金を提供し、「民主化」の短い期間中活動が行われたが、これらのセンターは、原子力ロビーが奪取し、今日センターは閉鎖されている。
“In 1996, Nesterenko successfully adopted a food additive made from apple pectin, recommended by the Ministries of Health in Russia and Ukraine, as an adsorbent of caesium 137. In the space of one month the amount of radionuclides in the body of the child can be reduced by 60-70% (2).”
「1996年に、ネステレンコはロシアとウクライナの保健省によって推奨されたアップルペクチンから作られた食品添加物をセシウム137の吸着剤として採用することに成功しました。1か月の間に、子供の体内の放射性核種の量は 60-70%削減されます(2)。」
“In 1994, Nesterenko met the rector of the Gomel Medical Institute, the pathologist and doctor Yuri Bandazhevsky, who, since 1991, had been researching the aetiology of the new diseases appearing among residents of the contaminated territories. With his wife Galina, a paediatrician and cardiologist, Bandazhevsky discovered that the frequency and severity of morphological and functional alterations of the heart increases in proportion to the amount of radioactive caesium incorporated into the body. He describes the heart disease found in young children, adolescents and adults with degenerative disease of the myocardium (heart muscle). as “caesium cardiomyopathy”, Sudden death occurs at any age, even in children. At levels above 50 becquerels per kilogram of body weight, irreversible lesions occur in vital organs.”
「1994年、Nesterenkoは、1991年以来、汚染された地域の住民の間で現れる新しい病気の病因を研究していた病理学者であり医師でゴメリ州医学研究所(Gomel State Medical Institute)学長であったYuri Bandazhevsky博士に会いました。  
バンダジェフスキー学長は、小児科医で心臓病専門医である妻のガリーナとともに、心臓の形態学的および機能的変化の頻度と重症度が、体内に取り込まれた放射性セシウムの量に比例して増加することを発見しました。 博士は、心筋の変性疾患を持つ幼児、青年および成人に見られる心臓病について説明しています。 「セシウム心筋症」のように、突然の死は子供でさえ、あらゆる年齢で起こるとした。 体重1キログラムあたり50ベクレルを超えるレベルでは、生命にかかわる臓器に不可逆的な病変が発生するというのだ。
“From 1996, the “Belrad ‘Institute and the Institute of Gomel worked together. Nesterenko worked in the villages and concentrated on measuring the internal contamination of the body by caesium137 using human radiation spectrometers supplied by Western NGOs. Together, the two institutes showed that if the level of Cs 137 in the diet of children and laboratory animals is reduced, irreversible damage to vital organs can be prevented. This discovery opened up completely new directions for scientific research.”
1996年から、「ベルラド研究所とゴメリ医学研究所」は共同研究をした。 ネステレンゴNesterenkoは村で働き、西側のNGOから提供された人間用の放射分光計を使用してセシウム137による体内の汚染を測定することに集中した。  
共に2つの研究所は、子供や実験動物の食事中のセシウム137のレベルが低下すれば、重要な臓器への不可逆的な損傷を防ぐことができることを示した。 この発見は、科学研究のまったく新しい方向性を切り開いた。


In April 1999, the two scientists were invited by the Belarusian parliament to take part in a commission to investigate the register of dose and the use of government funds by the Institute of Radiation Medicine at the Ministry of Health in its medical research on the consequences of the Chernobyl accident. Their findings displeased those committee members who were close to the Ministry.
1999年4月、2人の科学者はベラルーシ議会から招待され、厚生省の放射線医学研究所による医学研究における線量の登録と政府資金の使用を調査する委員会に参加した。 チェルノブイリ事故の彼らの調査結果は、省に近い委員会メンバーを不快にさせた。
Bandazhevsky and Nesterenko signed their own report and sent it to the Security Council of Belarus, which has overall responsibility for the health of the population. The Security Council insisted that the Ministry of Health withdraw its register and invited the latter to review the register “urgently on the basis of the conclusions” reached by Nesterenko and Bandazhevsky. Bandazhevsky sent a report to President Lukashenko, in which he severely criticized the work of the Institute of the Ministry and showed that 1998, out of a total of 17 billion roubles, only one billion had been spent effectively. On the night of 13th July 1999 he was arrested on the basis of a decree against terrorism introduced by Lukashenko. On 18th June 2001, he was sentenced by the military chamber of the Supreme Court of Belarus to 8 years in prison for corruption, in spite of the fact that there was no evidence against him.
BandazhevskyとNesterenkoは彼ら自身の報告書に署名し、それを国民の健康に全体的な責任を負うベラルーシ安全保障理事会に送った。 安全保障理事会は保健省がその登録を撤回することを主張し、NesterenkoとBandazhevskyによって達された「結論に基づいて緊急に」登録を再検討するように要請した。 バンダシェフスキーはルカシェンコ大統領に報告書を送った。ルカシェンコ大統領は同省の活動を厳しく非難し、1998年には合計170億ルーブルのうち10億だけが効果的に費やされたことを示した。 1999年7月13日の夜、バンダジェフスキーはルカシェンコ大統領によって導入された「テロに対する布告」に基づいて逮捕された。 2001年6月18日、彼に証拠なしにもかかわらず、ベラルーシ連邦最高裁判所の軍事委員会から汚職の罪で8年の懲役を宣告された。
ETHOS – Before this, in 1996, a group of French researchers, called ETHOS (a non-profit NGO as defined by No 1901 law), approached one of Professor Nesterenko’s centres for radiological control in the town of Olmany. ETHOS asked to be given the data it had collected and began to train its representatives in radioprotection in the contaminated territories around Chernobyl. ETHOS is an offshoot of CEPN, created in 1976 by EDF (Electricité de France) and the CEA (Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique). The French nuclear lobby is well and truly represented here!
ETHOS について:それに先立つ1996年、ETHOS(1901年の法律で定義されている非営利NGO)と呼ばれるフランスの研究者グループが、オルマニーの町にある放射線管理のためのNesterenko教授のセンターの1つにアプローチした。 ETHOSは収集したデータの提供を求め、チェルノブイリ周辺の汚染地域での放射線防護についてその代表者を訓練し始めた。 ETHOSは、1976年にEDF(Electricitéde France)およびCEA(Commissariatàl’Energie Atomique)によって作成されたCEPNという組織化のものだ。 フランスの原子力ロビーはここを本拠地としている!
One of ETHOS’ goals was to prepare a manual for the European Union on the management of nuclear accidents and of regions that have been contaminated with long-lived radionuclides, providing a programme of measures “for the sustainable management of radiological quality and social trust “(3). For three years, from 1996 to 1998, ETHOS exploited the data and measurements collected by personnel at the Olmany Centre, personnel that Nesterenko had trained and equipped, though ETHOS never compensated the technician for the extra work involved – a profitable and successful collaboration for the French at least. Then the Belarusian authorities, on advice from ETHOS, removed Nesterenko from the village of Olmany and from four other villages in the district of Stolin.
ETHOSの目標の1つは、核事故と長寿命の放射性核種で汚染された地域の管理に関するEU向けのマニュアルを作成し、「放射線の質と社会的信頼の持続可能な管理のための」対策プログラムを提供することだった(3)。 ETHOSは、1996年から1998年までの3年間、Nesterenkoが訓練し装備していたOlmany Centreのスタッフが収集したデータと測定値を利用したが、技術者に関連する追加作業を補償しなかった。 少なくともフランス人には利益となった。 その後、ベラルーシ当局は、ETHOSの助言に基づき、オルマニーの村とストリン地区の他の4つの村からネステレンコを除外した。
In effect, ETHOS had learned everything from Nesterenko and had collected his data in order to now supplant him. A real case of plagiarism but with one fundamental flaw: the ETHOS mission, as conceived by the French nuclear lobby had an insurmountable statutory limitation, that prevented it from taking any action in the area of health: ETHOS was not qualified to treat the population medically: (4) What was it doing, in that case, at Chernobyl?
実際、ETHOSはNesterenkoからすべてを学び、今や彼に取って代わるために彼のデータを収集していた。 盗作の本当のケースですが、1つの根本的な欠陥がある。フランスの核のロビーによって考案されたETHOSミッションには、法的制限が克服できないため、健康の分野で行動を起こすことができなかった:ETHOSは、人口を医学的に治療する資格がなかった(4)。そしてチェルノブイリで何をしていたのか?
I began to understand more when a friend, a sociologist, who had some involvement with ETHOS, told me that Jacques Lochard, leader of the ETHOS project, was employed by the CEA and had defined its task in this astonishing phrase. “We need to occupy the territory”.
ETHOSにある程度関わっていた社会学者の友人が、ETHOSプロジェクトのリーダーであるジャック・ロシャールJacques LochardがCEAに雇用されており、以下の驚くべきフレーズで、そのタスクを定義していたと私に話した時、私は理解し始めた。「私たちはテリトリーを占領する必要がある」。
Once it had completed its training with Nesterenko, ETHOS was able to present itself as the scientific reference point for radioprotection around Chernobyl and it then became the coordinator of the international Programme CORE (Cooperation and Rehabilitation Programme in the Belarusian territories contaminated by Chernobyl), whose founding members are the Chernobyl Committee of the Government of Belarus, the United Nations Development Programme, the French and German embassies, the European Commission, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation of Switzerland, UNESCO, the World Bank and four districts of Belarus.
ネステレンコからの訓練が完了すると、ETHOSはチェルノブイリ周辺の放射線防護のための科学的基準点としての地位を示すことに成功し、その後、国際プログラム・コアCORE(チェルノブイリで汚染されたベラルーシの地域における協力とリハビリテーションプログラム)のコーディネーターになった。 設立メンバーは、ベラルーシ政府のチェルノブイリ委員会、国連開発計画、フランスとドイツの大使館、欧州委員会、スイス開発協力機構、ユネスコ、世界銀行、ベラルーシの4つの地区である。
On 18th June 2003, I gave a detailed review of this programme to European Deputies and to various political and institutional authorities, on behalf of the Association Enfants de Tchernobyl, Bélarus (Children of Chernobyl, Belarus). In the accompanying notes I wrote:
“This program ignores the health problems in a region where more than 80% of children are ill following the disaster at Chernobyl, while this figure was only 20% before 1986 (5). The Memorandum of the CORE Programme provides for an independent audit after five years of operation, to assess its effectiveness. Our criticisms need to be taken into account from the outset of this project, because the health catastrophe in the contaminated territories is increasing and deepening, like a major epidemic. The contaminated population that has already been abandoned for 17 years by the international community cannot wait an extra five years for a project that does not provide qualified medical intervention. ”
「このプログラムは、チェルノブイリ原発災害後に子供の80%以上が病気になっている地域の健康問題を無視していますが、この数字は1986年までは、健康問題を持つ子どもは20%にすぎませんでした(5)。 COREプログラムの覚書は、その有効性を評価するために、5年間の運用後に独立した監査を提供します。 汚染された地域での健康災害は、大流行のように増加し深まっているため、このプロジェクトは最初から、批判される必要があります。 すでに国際社会によって17年間放置されている汚染された人々は、適格な医療介入を提供しないプロジェクトなどのために、さらに5年間も待つことはできません。

No response. The role of the ETHOS-CORE operation became clear in an article in Le Monde (20.02.08) that revealed “France is preparing for the consequences of a Chernobyl-type accident on its soil,” and that the ASN (Autorité de sûreté nucléaire) has launched a study on the feedback from the post-Chernobyl accident management, entrusted to the company Mutadis Consultants, the ETHOS coordinator.
返答はなかった。 ETHOS-CORE作戦の役割はルモンド(20.02.08)の記事で明らかになりました。「フランスはチェルノブイリ型の事故による土壌への影響に備えている」とASN(Autoritédesûreténucléaire) )は、チェルノブイリ事故後の事故管理からのフィードバックに関する調査を開始し、ETHOSコーディネーターであるMutadisコンサルタントに委託しました。
The aim of the initiative was “to assess the relevance of this feedback in the social, economic and political context of France and the European Union; to learn lessons from the perspective of a preventive system of post-accident management.”
The final report published on 19th March 2007 was entitled “Feedback from the post-accident management in the Belarusian context” and was signed by Gilles Hériard-Dubreuil (Mutadis Consultants), Jacques Lochard (CEPN), Henri Ollagnon (Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon), all three initiators of the European CORE program.
イニシアチブの目的は、「フランスと欧州連合の社会的、経済的、政治的文脈におけるこのフィードバックの関連性を評価すること。 事故後の管理の予防システムの観点から教訓を学ぶこと」であった。

2007年3月19日に発行された最終レポートは、「ベラルーシにおける事故後の管理からのフィードバック」と題され、ジルヘリアールデュブルイユ(Mutadisコンサルタント)、ジャック・ロシャール(CEPN)、アンリ・オラグノン(Institut National Agronomique Paris- グリニョン)、ヨーロピアン・コアプログラムの発足人3人全員だった。

Gilles Hériard-Dubreuil (Mutadis Consultants), Jacques Lochard (CEPN), Henri Ollagnon (Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon)
Thus, supported politically and financially by the nuclear lobby and the nuclear states, ETHOS, which appeared to be helping to solve the problems caused by the Chernobyl disaster, was in fact blocking the recognition of the health catastrophe that independent scientists like Nesterenko and Bandajevsky were trying to expose in the face of a thousand obstacles. The importance for the lobby was to define radiological quality and to build social trust (sic) following a nuclear disaster. The scientific information provided to Western observers, by the contaminated children, the guinea pigs, would not be altered since the internal radiation load had not been reduced with the use of the adsorbent that CORE refused to fund. A puzzle, made up of apparently unconnected pieces, only comprehensible once it is understood that what is important is the collection of useful data in the management of a major nuclear accident in one of the richest countries in Europe. Yuri Chtcherbak, medical doctor and writer, leader of the Ukrainian Green Party in 1990 and elected to the first “democratic” Supreme Soviet of the USSR, recounted a conversation he had with a French professor. He had asked the man what he considered the most significant aspect of the accident at Chernobyl and the man replied that: “It’s very interesting! I would never have been able to set up this sort of experiment in my laboratory. I can now observe.” Chtcherbak commented “It’s hard to imagine the cynicism of these people, of their behaviour!”
このように、チェルノブイリ原発事故によって引き起こされた問題の解決に貢献していると見せかけるETHOSは、原子力ロビーと核保有国によって政治的および財政的に支援され、実際にはNesterenkoやBandajevskyのような独立した科学者に対して数多くの妨害をしている。原子力ロビーが重点を置いたことは、放射線の質を定義し、原子力災害後の社会的信頼(原文)を構築することだった。 COREが資金提供を拒否した吸着剤の使用により内部放射線負荷が減少しなかったからといって、汚染された地区でモルモットにされている子供たちについて、西側のオブザーバーに提供された科学的情報は変更されない。明白な形ではつながっていないピースで構成されたパズルにおいて重要なのは、ヨーロッパで最も裕福な国の1つにおける大規模な原子力事故の管理に役立つデータの収集であることが理解されて初めて理解可能になる。医師であり作家であり、1990年にウクライナの緑の党の指導者であり、ソ連の最初の「民主的」最高ソビエトに選出されたユーリ・チッチェルバクは、フランス人の教授との会話を詳しく述べた。彼はチェルノブイリでの事故の最も重要な側面を何と考えているかをある人物に尋ねた。その人物はこう答えた:「非常に興味深い問題だね!私の研究室でこの種の実験をセットアップすることはできなかっただろう。このような実験を観察できるようになったんだよ。」 Chtcherbakは「これらの人々の、彼のような人々の行動精神を想像するのは難しい!」とコメントした。
I do not know if Chtcherbak could imagine at that time that the cynicism that so outraged him was only a foreshadowing of the systematic crime perpetrated at the level of European governments: to refuse to administer a naturally preventive product that is as well-tolerated as pectin to the children of Chernobyl so that they could undertake a study on how to manage the consequences of a disaster here. This is intolerable.
当時、彼を激怒させた行動規範がヨーロッパの政府レベルで犯された系統的犯罪の予兆だったとチェッチャーバクが想像できたかどうかはわからない。 チェルノブイリの子供たちに、ペクチン投与でさえ拒否した彼らが、原子力災害の結果を管理する方法についての研究を始めることができるようにしたのだ。 なんとも耐えられない話である。
I wrote to Jacques Lochard, “Radioprotection in the territories contaminated by Chernobyl is impossible without scientific measurement of the body of each child and of the food the child eats. This is what the Ministry of Health of Belarus will NOT do because it wants to continue to publish its generalised and false statistics. This is the reason for its opposition to Professor Nesterenko’s use of human radiation spectrometers whose results reveal the true levels of contamination. These measures are essential for targeted prophylaxis of each child and to establish the correlation between the radioactive load in the body and the many illnesses studied by the pathologist Bandazhevsky. But they also reveal the true extent of the Chernobyl disaster, which has only just begun. To ignore the science, and concentrate only on education and social support, can become an alibi for the cover-up, and leaves people in a state of “ignorance and uncertainty” (6). You are right to hope that the Belarusian people take their destiny into their own hands. Belarusians like the scientist Nesterenko, for example. Either their expertise will be used to create genuine radioprotection policies or there will be no radioprotection at all. Without these scientists, the impoverished peasant farmers will remain trapped, with neither means nor knowledge and they will never have the strength to face their destiny. Nesterenko’s 370 centres must be restored to him. ”
Wladimir Tchertkoff

私はジャック・ロシャールに手紙を書きました。「チェルノブイリで汚染された地域での放射線防護は、子供一人一人の身体と子供が食べる食べ物を科学的に測定することなしには不可能です。これは、ベラルーシ保健省が、一般的で誤った統計を発表し続けることを望み、行わないことです。これこそが、ネステレンコ教授による放射線分光計を使用した真の汚染レベルが明らかになることに反対する理由でしょう。これらの対策は、子供に標的を定めた予防と、体内の放射能負荷と病理学者バンダシェフスキーによって研究された多くの病気との間の相関関係を確立するために不可欠です。一方、始まったばかりのチェルノブイリ原発事故の真の範囲を明らかする科学を無視し、一方教育と社会的支援のみに集中することは、隠蔽のアリバイともいえ、人々を「無知と不確実性」の状態に置くものです(6)。ベラルーシの人々が自分たちの運命を自分の手中にすることが正しい選択のはずです。たとえば、ベラルーシ人は科学者のNesterenkoを好んでいます。専門知識が本物の放射線防護ポリシーを作成するために使用されても、まったく放射線防護対策がありません。彼のような科学者がいなければ、貧しい農民は手段も知識もないままに閉じ込められたままであり、自分たちの運命に立ち向かう力がありません。ネステレンコの370のセンターを復元する必要があります。 」


April 2013
1 – Goncharova R.I. & Ryabokon, 25-26th October 1994, Conference “Radiobiological Consequences of Nuclear Accidents”.
2 – Swiss Medical Weekly 2004;134:24–27 · www.smw.ch
3 – International publication called SAGE to which the academic Vassili Nesterenko contributed. Internationally renowned as a physicist, a liquidator from Chernobyl in the first hours of the accident, a specialist in radioprotection and unequalled in his expertise on the contaminated territories of Belarus, it was logical to turn to him for this information. Like the 4 other foreign writers at SAGE, Nesterenko provided written contributions to the report. He was assured by the CEPN that his text on radioprotection measures (anthropogammetric measures, pectin cures, information for children, parents and teachers) would be taken up in full, unedited in the SAGE project. In fact, the essential measures and his four main recommendations in the event of a major accident, in the conclusion to his text, were not included in the publication. The fact that they included his name in the list of authors at the front of the book after censoring his text is a morally reprehensible act on the part of those responsible for its publication.
学術的なVassili Nesterenkoが寄稿したSAGEと呼ばれる国際的な出版物。物理学者、事故最初の数時間、チェルノブイリのリクイデータ、放射線防護の専門家として国際的に知られており、ベラルーシの汚染された地域に関するネス手連呼の専門知識では比類がありませんでした。 SAGEの他の4人の外国の著者と同様に、Nesterenkoはレポートに寄稿を提供しました。ネステレンコはCEPNによって、放射線防護対策(人体計測法、ペクチン治療、子供、親、教師のための情報)に関する彼の文章がSAGEプロジェクトで編集されずに完全に削除されてしまうことを確信していました。実際、主要な事故が発生した場合の彼の主要な勧告と4つの主要な勧告は、彼のテキストへの結論として、この出版物には含まれていませんでした。彼のテキストを検閲した後、彼らがネステレンコの名前を本の最初の著者のリストに含めたという事実は、その出版の責任者による、道徳的に非道な行為です。
4 – M. Henry Ollagnon, of l’Institut National d’Agronomie Paris-Grignon, member of the ETHOS team, advocated sustainable development in the contaminated territories as a way to ensure their rehabilitation. During a conference at Stoline in November 2001, he told Professor Michel Fernex : “The work we’re doing is really good, but the children are becoming more and more ill”.
5 – Statement from the President of the Academy of Sciences in Belarus, in December 1999, confirmed by the Vice–Minister of Health of Belarus at a parliamentary hearing about the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster, in April 2000.
6 – In 1958, a year before the agreement was signed that subordinated the WHO to the IAEA in the area of radiation and health (28th May 1959 WHA 12/40), WHO published a report analysing the “ mental health issues arising from the peaceful uses of atomic energy” The report concluded with the words ” But in the long run the greatest hope of mental health in the future of the peaceful uses of atomic energy is the raising of a generation which has learnt to live on terms with ignorance and uncertainty and which, in the words of Joseph Addison, the 18th century English poet, “rides in the Whirlwind, and directs the Storm”. (World Health Organisation Technical Report Series no 151). Thus the strategy of ignorance and deceit was protected and made legitimate.
Article published in “Japanese Scientists”, December 2012.
 Note from Susie Greaves, the translator of this article by Wladimir Tchertkoff, and of his book “Le crime de Tchernobyl: le goulag nucleaire”published by Actes Sud 2006
Unfortunately, ETHOS, with Jacques Lochard once more as director, has been visiting Japan for the last two years, advising the population on radioprotection. Lochard promotes ETHOS along with his counterpart Ms Ryoko Ando, the director of the NGO, ETHOS Fukushima. In November 2011 before ETHOS Fukushima started up, the Japanese government held a meeting at the Cabinet Office to which Lochard was invited.
残念なことに、ETHOSは、ジャック・ロシャールがもう一度ディレクターとして、過去2年間日本を訪れ、放射線防護について日本国民に助言しています。 ロシャールLochardは、NGOのETHOS Fukushimaのディレクターである安藤量子(本名:鎌田陽子)氏と一緒にETHOSを宣伝しています。 エトス福島が発足する前の2011年11月、日本政府はロシャールを招待した内閣府で会議を開きました。
At public meetings, Lochard speaks with pride of the radioprotection work done by ETHOS and CORE around Chernobyl. His message to the Japanese people is remarkably similar to the message given to the victims of Chernobyl. Psychological factors such as poor attitude, lack of determination, and fear are the real enemies. He says “[…] the fear of radiation is slowly vanishing outside the affected areas around Fukushima….there is really no objective reason for being scared taking into account the extremely low levels of exposure….a key issue will be to maintain strong links (social economic and cultural) between the affected areas and the rest of the country…the experience of Chernobyl has shown that over time the stigma of the territories and their inhabitants is a serious issue and it is important to take action against this risk[…] The decision about the 20 mSv is a good news. This will allow many people to return to their home soon. Of course the objective will be to implement all feasible protection actions to reduce and maintain exposure as low as reasonably achievable if possible below 1 mSv […].
公開会議で、ロシャールはチェルノブイリ周辺でETHOSとCOREによって行われた放射線防護作業の誇りをもって話しました。彼の日本人へのメッセージは、チェルノブイリの犠牲者に与えられたメッセージと非常に似ています。態度の悪さ、決意の欠如、恐れなどの心理的要因こそが私たちにとっては本当の敵です。彼は、「[…]福島周辺の被災地の外では、放射線への恐怖が徐々に消えつつあります…非常に低いレベルの被ばくを考慮して怖がる客観的な理由はありません…。重要な問題は、強いつながりを維持することです。 (社会的経済的および文化的)影響を受けた地域と国の他の地域との間...チェルノブイリの経験は、時間の経過とともに、地域とその住民の汚名が深刻な問題であり、このリスクに対して行動を起こすことが重要であることを示しています[… ] 20 mSvに関する決定は朗報です。これにより、多くの人がすぐに家に帰ることができます。もちろん、その目的は、可能であれば、1 mSv未満で可能な限り合理的に達成できるように被ばくを低減および維持するため、すべての実行可能な保護措置を実装することです[…]。
It is worth noting that in Belarus, twenty or so years ago, it was Jacques Lochard who conducted cost benefit analysis on evacuation plans for the IAEA Chernobyl Project.  While the former Soviet Union scholars demanded the residents’ relocation where levels were above 1mSv/year, and experts from ICRP and WHO, at levels above 5 mSv/yr, Lochard, considering the cost, insisted that it could be up to 100 mSv/yr.  Possibly because Lochard proposed this ridiculous figure, a compromise was made and the mandatory evacuation level was set at 5 mSv/yr. One has to ask whether Lochard, an economist by profession, see the contradictory nature of these various pronouncements. Either it is damaging to health to live in areas contaminated at levels above 1 mSv/y or it is not. Of course, his reference to ALARA, the cynical principle used throughout the industry (as low as reasonably achievable), tells us all we need to know. Whether it is damaging to their health or not, people will not be evacuated if the government cannot or will not find the funds.
20年ほど前のベラルーシでは、IAEAチェルノブイリ・プロジェクトの避難計画についてのコスト・ベネフィット分析を実施したのはジャック・ロカールでした。以前のソビエト連邦の学者たちはレベルが1mSv /年を超える居住者のリロケーションを要求し、5mSv /年を超えるレベルのICRPとWHOの専門家は、コストを考慮して、ロシャールは最大100mSv / yrを掲げました。おそらくロシャールがこのばかげた数字を提案したため、妥協が行われ、強制避難レベルは5 mSv /年に設定されました。専門職はエコノミストであるロシャールが、これらのさまざまな発音の矛盾した性質を理解しているかどうかを尋ねなければなりません。 1 mSv /年を超えるレベルで汚染された地域に住むことは健康に害を及ぼさないという主張は、そうではありません。もちろん、業界全体で使用されている皮肉な原理(合理的に達成可能な限り低い)であるALARAへのロシャールの言及は、私たちが知る必要があるすべてを私たちに伝えています。健康に害があるかどうかにかかわらず、政府が資金を投じない、または投じられない場合、人々は避難できません。

13:45-15:15 Dr. Bandazhevsky: I do not want to surprise you, but already Japanese children with cesium level more than 20-30Bq/kg have been found and the number of such children could increase.

A table in ICRP publication 111  shows even the intake of 10Bq per day of cesium would accumulate more than 1400Bq per body after 3 months.




あってはならないことです。。。ベラルーシで絶対、原発は稼働させてはなりません!!! 同時に被ばく者に対する医療を施すべきです!(医療者たちも原発導入しようとする大統領に忖度し、被ばくの影響を声に出せなかったらしい!!!ちなみにルカシェンコ大統領は、コロナはウォッカを飲めば大丈夫と言い、自身も感染したらしい。。。ベラルーシ国民には、しっかりとした医療体制が必要です!!!)



チェルノブイリ事故で被ばく ベラルーシが原発導入 来月初稼働 現地で戸惑いも  

2020年7月29日 06時00分 東京新聞





ルカシェンコ大統領の独裁ぶりと原発推進、チェルノブイリの健康被害隠し、 バンダジェフスキー博士の研究成果と国外追放が短時間でわかるエピソード




特命報道記者2011 フジテレビ


福島原発20キロ圏内 浪江町の現状を取材

動物保護団体、高邑(たかむら)勉 民主党国会議員


11月8日 ウクライナ・キエフ市


ウクライナ政府 非常事態省 役人ウラジーミル氏が同行







燃料を放置は出来ない。20年~30年後 日本も同じ問題に直面するでしょう。



取材には、運転手を兼ねて ベラルーシ政府職員 

1キロあたり18~30ベクレル 100ベクレルの基準値以下

3241ベクレル。 1キロ当たりに換算すると2万2351ベクレル







WHO(世界保健機関) IAEA(国際原子力機関)が認めているのは、


全国放射線医学 人間環境科学実用センター


「全国放射線医学 人間環境科学実用センターは、2002年に新しく建てられました。































長野県松本市 菅谷昭市長
平成16年3月 松本市長就任




ベラルーシ  ルカシェンコ大統領



何で皆 ベラルーシで障害があることを隠そうとしている?












ベルラッド放射能安全研究所 ウラジーミル・バベンコ副所長

心臓手術を受ける女の子 ユリアさん15歳

北ウクライナ 汚染地帯の出身の虎児








データがないという言葉はどう聞こえる のだろう。